Choice of Law and Offers of Judgment

Southeast Floating Docks, Inc., et. al. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Case No. SC11-285, filed February 2, 2012: In a certified question from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court held that s. 768.79 regarding offers of judgment is substantive, and thus does NOT apply to contracts providing for the applicability of another state’s laws (Michigan) that don’t contain such a provision. In this case, a claim was filed on the contractor’s performance bond when a dispute arose for breach of contract. The surety refused the contractor’s offer of judgment to settle for $300,000, which then sought attorney fees after obtaining a judgment of no liability against the surety. (RPPTL Subcommittee).

Trenton H. Cotney
Board Certified in Construction Law
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1207 N Franklin St, Ste 222
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 579-3278
www.trentcotney.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe