Award of Fees Reversed


Mike Cobb v. David Durando and Jane Durando, husband and wife, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D847a, Case No. 2D12-1991, issued April 17, 2013: After prevailing in a bench trial against their roofing contractor for breach of contract, the homeowners sought attorney fees pursuant to section 768.79 based on a single demand for judgment. The award of fees was reversed based on the requirements of Rule 1.442, FRCP, because the demand for judgment failed to "state the amount…attributable to each party," as required by the rule. A dissent by Judge Alterbernd argued, in part, that only the husband had signed the roofing contract, and that application of the rule to a single cause of action which he could have brought in his name alone was "seems to have achieved form over substance."
(From RPPTL Subcommittee) 



Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe