Diminution in Value Versus Cost to Repair

In Heine v. Parent Construction, Inc., 2009 WL 763534 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), the Court held that a homeowner was entitled to damages in the form of diminution in the value of the property due to construction defects rather than the cost to repair the defects.  The defects consisted of improper elevation and potential exposure to flood damage. 

The cost to repair would have required rebuilding the house and would have resulted in economic waste meaning that rebuilding the home would have been exorbitantly expensive given the error.  Accordingly, the Court held that the homeowner was entitled to the difference between the house if it had been built correctly and the house as-built.


Trenton H. Cotney
Board Certified in Construction Law
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1207 N Franklin St, Ste 222
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 579-3278

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe