No Damages for Delay Clause Ineffective

A contractor was entitled to delay damages despite a "no damages for delay" provision in the prime contract when the owner requested excessive design changes.  Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New York, 448 N.E.d2d 413 (NY 1983).
Trenton H. Cotney
Board Certified in Construction Law
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1207 N Franklin St, Ste 222
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 579-3278

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe