Promisory Estoppels Cannot be Used to Avoid the Statute of Frauds
DK Arena, Inc., v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC,
38 Fla. L. Weekly S187a, Case No SC10-897, filed March 28, 2013. Florida
Supreme Court quashed and remanded appellate
decision based on Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.,
190 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 1966) and held that the judicially-created doctrine of
promissory estoppels cannot be used to avoid the Statute of Frauds (Section
725.01 F. S.). Specifically, the court held that an oral statement by the
seller of real property (celebrity boxing promoter Don King) for an extension
of the due diligence period in the written contract was not effective, even
though it otherwise meet the criteria for "promissory estoppel."
NOTE; While Justice Canady dissent based on his
disagreement that there is conflict with Tanenbaum, he finds jurisdiction based on conflict with Bradley
v. Sanchez, 943 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), but agrees with the analysis
of the district court.
(RPPTL Subcommittee)
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment