Arbitrator Makes Determination of No Prevailing Party
Diane N. Wells and Thomas
G. Wells v. Hector Castro, et. al., 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1509a, Case Trytek v.
Gale Industries, Inc., 3 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 2009); however, the trial
court's attempt to overturn and modify or vacate the arbitration award as to this
determination was not within the limited statutory grounds for doing so
pursuant to ss. 682.13 and 682.14.
No.
3D12-3039, filed July 13, 2013. Writ of Mandamus was issued to compel the trial
court to confirm an arbitration award and to quash an order determining that one
of the parties was the "prevailing party" for purposed of an award of
attorney fees. The parties had agreed that the arbitrator could determine the
"prevailing party" as part of the proceedings on breach of contract
and construction lien claims, and the arbitrator made the determination that
there was NO prevailing party under the factors set forth in
Editor's Note: This is yet another case holding
that an arbitration award may not be
reversed based on the arbitrator's error of law, which is a real
impediment to the greater use of statutory arbitration provisions. See Schmurmacher
Holding, Inc., v. Noriega, 542 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 1998).
(From RPPTL Subcommittee)
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment