Reversal Due to "Apostrophe-Challenged"
Charlyn
Bradshaw and Kenneth Bradshaw, her husband v. Boynton-JCP Associates, LTD,
d/b/a Boynton Beach Mall and Simon Property Group, Inc., 38
Fla. L. Weekly D823a, Case No. 4D11-4242, issued April 10, 2013: A final
judgment awarding attorney's fees pursuant to an offer of judgment pursuant to s. 768.79, Fla. Statutes (2007)
and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442, was reversed because it was
"apostrophe-challenged" and, thus, ambiguous. Citing State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols,
932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006), the appellate court stated that the issue is not
whether it is "fair or logical to apply the requirements" of the
rule, the offer must be sufficiently clear to allow the offeree to make a
decision without clarification.
(From RPPTL Subcommittee)
(From RPPTL Subcommittee)
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment