Summary Judgement Reversed Due to Conflicting Testimony
Plantation
Key Office Park, LLLP et. al. v. Pass International, Inc., et. al., 38
Fla. L. Weekly D736a, Case No. 4D12-169 and 4D12-199, issued April 3, 2013:
Following a fire during construction, owner sued contractor and subcontractors
for reformation (as well as breach of contract, negligence and statutory
violations). On the issue of reformation, the trial court granted summary
judgment against owner on the issue of whether A201 (the general conditions
that prohibit consequential damages) was incorporated in the A111 contract
signed by the parties. Based on conflicting testimony of the parties on this
issue, the summary judgment was reversed
based on the trial court's inability to determine credibility of the witnesses
at that point. Citing its own decision in the analogous case of Resort of Indian Spring, Inc., v. Indian
Spring County Club, Inc., 747 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA
1999), the appellate court found the summary judgment to be improper.
(From RPPTL Subcommittee)
(From RPPTL Subcommittee)
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment