Contractor Could Not Use FDOT Fees Provision

In Anderson Columbia Co., Inc. v. FDOT, 744 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), a contractor could not use an attorney's fees provision in a FDOT contract because the fees provision was for the benefit of FDOT and was limited to "ascertaining and collecting losses under the bond" and contractor's action was not on the bond.


Trenton H. Cotney
Board Certified in Construction Law
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1207 N Franklin St, Ste 222
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 579-3278

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe