Diaz & Russell Corporation v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, 2014 WL 2199757 (3D13-1764, May 28, 2014)
A licensed
general contractor does not have to identify the architect in its design-build
contract - DBPR oversteps its authority in sanctioning contractor.
As reported last
month, the Board of Architecture and Interior Design entered a final
administrative order imposing a fine of $10,000 and costs of $6,867.53 on a
licensed general contractor for not identifying its intended architect before
offering the design-build services. The
project was an interior partition wall with a total contract price of
$5,900. The Third District Court of
Appeal reversed on the grounds the Board’s interpretation of the statute was
erroneous; there is no requirement in Florida law that requires a licensed
contractor to identify the architect it intends to use - it is sufficient that
the architect hired by the design-build contractor is licensed as an architect.
The
board’s motion for rehearing based on an alleged factual distinction that the contractor hired an
engineer to prepare the drawings and specifications, rather than an architect has been DENIED.
(From The Florida Bar Construction Law Committee )
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment