Visiting Nurse Association of Florida, Inc. v. Jupiter Medical Center, Inc., 2014 WL 3360314 (SC11-2468, July 10, 2014)

Supreme Court of Florida concludes the trial court cannot set aside an arbitrator’s award based on the claim that an arbitrator’s construction of a contract renders it illegal.

            This case from the Supreme Court of Florida presents an interesting survey of the present            state of the law relating to the authority of arbitrators and review of arbitration awards.     The following rules are gleaned from the case:

            ●          the statutory grounds for modification or vacation of an arbitrator’s award are exclusive and cannot be supplemented by contract or by public policy;

            ●          an arbitrator’s award cannot be modified or vacated based on “manifest disregard of the law,” or, as the Court phrased it, “mere errors of law;”

            ●          an arbitrator’s award cannot be modified or vacated based on a claim of contract illegality;

            ●          the arbitrator and not the trial court, either before or after arbitration, determines challenges to the validity of the contract as a whole (as opposed to challenges to the severable arbitration agreement itself); and


            ●          an arbitrator does not exceed their power (a statutory ground for modifying or vacating an award) when they misinterpret contractual provisions or commit errors of law.

(From The Florida Bar Construction Law Committee)

Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dotted Line: When Contractors Can Walk Off the Job

"Mass-timber" Sees Greater Use in Roofing and Construction Projects in Europe