J.B.D. Construction, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company, 2014 WL 3377690 (No. 13-10138, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, July 11, 2014).
The
Court stated that the duty to defend is greater than the duty to indemnify, the
insurer must defend “even if
the allegations in the complaint are factually incorrect or meritless,” and doubts are resolved in favor of the
insured, and then held that the allegation that there was “damage to other property” was sufficient to trigger the duty
to defend.
The
Court stated the duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend, is
dependent on the final judgment or
final resolution of the claim, and requires the insured to “demonstrate that it suffered a loss
under the policy.” It appears that the
Court found no evidence in the
record of “damage to other property” despite Contractor’s evidence of engineering reports in the record.
(From The Florida Bar Construction Law Committee)
Trenton H. Cotney
Florida Bar Certified Construction Lawyer
Trent Cotney, P.A.
1211 N Franklin St
Tampa, FL 33602
Comments
Post a Comment